Userbenchmark score low gaming reddit No quad core today could do it as well as a 6 core. I just play at 1080p and am trying to maintain 60fps. The only questions I have are about userbenchmark specifically. 1625v seems to be my sweet spot How come i have so much of a lower score, compared to these other guys? Just upgraded my CPU, because my old system had a cpu bottleneck, but somehow my old system still perform port royal better than my new one. The first is that the benchmark results aren't actually very useful. Is UserBenchmark's Effective Speed for gaming performance? I've noticed since the addition of the Memory latency score, the effective speed has been hugely affected. As always, please ensure you verify the information you read online before drawing conclusions or making purchases. I am getting low scores for I keep reading about Nvidia having higher overhead on their driver software . However, since there's a low sample rate of 5700 XT AE's, and it's a comparatively low volume part on the site, my results have stayed up. As far as I could tell, it was performing as well as it should (it was a sizable upgrade over my previous GPU), but tonight I wanted to actually test against UserBenchmark to make sure I'm not missing anything. Their findings do not typically match those of known reputable and trustworthy sources. Welcome to r/gaminglaptops, the hub for gaming laptop enthusiasts. Please read the rules. Your post has been approved. I loaded up UserBenchmark and that gave me a performance rating of 117%. . Low userbenchmark score. What are our best options for comparing system performance? I'm building a low end pc for gaming and video editing. Score for gaming (8%), desktop (57%) and workstation (7%) 286K subscribers in the overclocking community. Userbenchmark: https://www. That gave no problems as I would've expected if my PSU was not holding up. Questions about a low UserBenchmark score and how to fix it. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated. Enabled high performance in windows settings and PBO in BIOS, restarted and still got a score of around 800 multicore. Iv noticed in most games now that 4k 60fps is starting to struggle and even in some older games was still not able to achieve this. CPU: Intel Core i7-4790. I don't know if that is causing lower CPU score or not on your setup . otherwise they seem to really bias their rating systems against amd. 1 +- 6. Hi, I also updated and my score went up from 3600 to around 4000. I should also add that it is performing as expected in game. I'm sure you could look it up and find specific test for comparison sake. Wanted to test cinebench and got a score of 804 multicore, obviously extremely low. You don't necessarily need a PC to be a member of the PCMR. Here is scores/temps Graphics Score 29965 CPU Score 7875 10600k - 3200 mhz ddr4 CL16 - W10 - 4090 suprim x Clock frequency 2,820 MHz (2,235 MHz) Average clock frequency 2,809 MHz Memory clock frequency 1,313 MHz (1,313 MHz) Average memory clock frequency 1,313 MHz Average temperature 51 C Those scores are just slightly below average for CPU and GPU. The point is, Ryzen 50** is the 10th gen competition NOT the 11, next year AMD will release their 5nm processors and extend the gap even further since is confirmed the micro grill makers will create yet another 14nm+++++, and as I said the ""gaming crown"" means absolute nothing, not only because it is only 10-15 FPS difference on high framerates at low res, but also because "gaming" is just a Posted by u/xDraminx - 1 vote and no comments Userbenchmark - 0% on all register (Gaming, Desktop, Workstation) Hi, i have a Lenovo Ideapad 720 (Lenovo 81C7) I have done a userbenchmark, because my computer works very slowly A lot of people overclock when doing those tests and which 3080 is it cause the higher tires have much higher clocks and it may be that if you just do some simple and Benchmark results: EVOO EG-LP5 Performance Results - UserBenchmark Benchmark results of another LP5: EVOO EG-LP5 Performance Results - UserBenchmark. 2 standard deviations above the mean. Gamers that do not wish to pay “marketing fees” can invest those savings in a better GPU which will produce an unquestionably faster gaming PC" Kings of gaming all use this, along with the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. List any error messages and symptoms. The Personal Computer. Userbenchmark says your highest turbo clock is below the rated base clock. It got a laptop with i7-8750H,1050 ti, and 8gb of ram yet i cant reach 140 fps, my fps hit on 70-110, feels like bottleneck but i don't know… I ran userbenchmark on the new pc I just put together. My hypothesis for poor hdd performance is that it's around 80% full, which slows it down maybe. I. Try something like Unigine heaven and compare to scores from reviews of the same card model that you have. Describe your problem. Low UserBenchmark score across the board on RTX 3080 and 5600X build Built this PC a couple weeks ago, and UserBenchmark score are all below expectations, 34th percentile. I checked temps while it was running and saw that the CPU maxed at 67, and the GPU maxed at 57, so it shouldn't be a temp throttling issue. 6. com and post the link to the results as explained in RULE #2. Why is my setup underperforming? Posted by u/jivakaa - 2 votes and 2 comments UserBenchmark Graphics Card Low Score I recently purchased a new computer and built it and ran a UserBenchmark test. Try running a 3DMark benchmark or Cinebench and see the scores but I am almost certain that your CPU is working perfectly fine just like mine was. Ran it a few times, CPU score is 10% lower and below expectations. The MCAT (Medical College Admission Test) is offered by the AAMC and is a required exam for admission to medical schools in the USA and Canada. I personally use a couple but at the end of the day, it is your call whether you are satisfied with the result and price. Such a small difference could be just normal run to run variance (as UBM isn't super accurate), or it could just be you had a program or something open in the background using some GPU, or even your room being particularly warm that day. probably some variance due to how short the userbenchmark apps are and the userbenchmark database will tend to have overclocked/higher power target GPUs than normal. A friendly place to get helpful information about building a Personal Computer of your own-for gaming, work or basic use, we can help. If you look at where your result falls on the bell curve, you're really not very far below the peak/average performance. typically i run userbenchmark to see if anything's really wrong or underperforming, and then when i start tweaking stuff then for cpu i use p95 to stress test and cinebench r20 for benchmark. He is facing problems, userbenchmark is pretty good for cpu and he’s scoring pretty low for a 3600. Cinebench R23 Scores (on A/C power, Balanced power plan): CPU (Multi Core): 14468 pts CPU (Singe Core): 1742 pts 3DMark Timespy Score (On A/C power, Balanced power plan): 3070 (10% higher than average) Graphics Score: 2735, CPU Score: 10080 Do a GPU stress test and check whether your iGPU is overheating Mid to Low scores . /r/MCAT is a place for MCAT practice, questions, discussion, advice, social networking, news, study tips and more. Strange. But that seems low to me for a 970. This gives me consistent boost to around 4450 GHz all cores and score of around 4350 :) It seems there's a lot of benchmarks out there - but scores are useless unless compared against a database of similar systems. Problem is you have a cheapo 60GB SSD that isn't performing well, and your external HDD's aren't exactly fast, and one of them is plugged into a USB 2 port. So basically, UB gives single core performance a significantly larger 'weight' than The actual average scores were 164. realistically 30th percentile is basically just normal. Here's the benchmark results. My 3dmark score is also like 2-3k under the avarage points of PCs with the same setup. All things overclocking go here. If you're at 100⁰C, you're thermal throttling and that's the reason for the low scores. The #1 social media platform for MCAT advice. if you're encoding a huge video in the background, and playing a game at the same time, setting the game to higher priority than video editing software will make sure the game runs well at the cost of increased time required I purchased an RTX 2080 Gigabyte Gaming OC over Black Friday. Userbenchmark, the benchmark, has 2 very big problems though that work to make it basically fail as a benchmark. Please read the rules carefully. I exchange my Y740 and got the refreshed 2070MQ model so I no longer have the user benchmark scores saved, just my fire strike and time spy scores. Yesterday I ran UserBenchMark program and my CPU score was about 80% and above expectations. You see, userbenchmark scores are derived from userbenchmark results, so all the data is user data. 7 and a mutlithread score of 1155. As you can see the results while not horrible are relatively below expectations. The SSD scores look bad but that doesn’t impact your frame rate while gaming. If you formatted, then nothing would be left over. Why is this happeneing. It says that "this PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)". ? Thanks userbenchmark is good for figuring out issues with parts performing way worse than they should be. Therefore, your post has been filtered by Automod. They claim that games don't use more than 4 cores. I ran the Userbenchmark thing and got 59th percentile for whatever that is worth Switching to High has made it better but not perfect. Which is appallingly low. Join our passionate community to stay informed and connected with the latest trends and technologies in the gaming laptop world. This means the score was probably not overclocked at all and was just a good score (~98th percentile). 5k. So, really, they should get rid of the quad core score and replace it with 6 or 8 core. In Userbenchmark's benchmark results, everything including my graphics card looked very normal. ussrbenchmark is notorious to give low gpu scores because most people there overclock thier gpu's and then test. When I built my pc in december 2017 I ran userbenchmark and took a screenshot of the score, and then ran it now - the scores are somewhat worse now. Unigine Heaven: 2449. The results seem ok except the Graphics Card seems to be under-performing. If that's the case, either your CPU cooler wasn't installed properly or isn't adequate for a 13900k (that chip runs stupid hot). I've already noticed the apparent bias that UserBenchmark seems to have against AMD CPUs (as written in multiple post on multiple subreddits) I was wondering if it is still fine to compare GPU scores with other users. But should be paired with a good quality AMD GPU to get the most out of it. Here's what I have tried so far. Business, Economics, and Finance. RAM: Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB. 3dmark and passmark are good tools to benchmark gpu's. Hey guys, I've had my PC for a while now but for the last few months its been acting up a lot. For high refresh rate gaming you definitely want a 6 core CPU, whether it's a 1600 or 8700K. Planning on building a computer but need some advice? This is the place to ask! /r/buildapc is a… Passmark cares about everything and the a750 is not good at everything. Given how passmark works it gives a score based on the overall score of a bunch of different tests. At AMD’s launch presentation, they said they finally had the best CPUs for gaming. userbenchmark. All the components score is similar when I benchmarked first time except the graphics card and it is working properly and I dont notice any decrease in performance. CPU-Z gave me a single thread score of 159. Only reason I can think of is I believe I've updated BIOS since first test, and maybe they lowered the voltage during EXPO and other changes affecting it? I have made all the ram, driver and system files tests. Even for userbenchmark, that's a low score. Especially the CPU seems to be performing in the 6th (!!) percentile, while the SSD drive and memory are performing at 25th and 23rd percentile, respectively. Is this worth saving money on and putting it in the new pc or is it just going to be too slow? 10M subscribers in the pcmasterrace community. Also worrying about budget doesn't matter. EDIT: My Userbenchmark result Gpu score: 17,189 Cpu score: 10,631 Overall: 15,733 It looks like the gpu score is in the bottom 19% of 3080 + i7 10700k benchmarks If you don't mind me asking, how does that score compare to your findings with the i7+3080 system? I still have around 20 days left for a possible return to newegg if I wanted to roll the dice on getting a better 3080. You seem to be linking to or recommending the use of UserBenchMark for benchmarking or comparing hardware. edit: I kept reading your post and your situation is 100% exactly the same as mine (check some of my last posts), userbenchmark score is perfectly fine even if it says below average. It's not about the hardware in your rig, but the software in your heart! Join us in celebrating and promoting tech, knowledge, and the best gaming, study, and work platform there exists. The CPU-Z website says my cpu should be getting scores around 509 (single) and 3860 (multiple). . But on userbenchmark you can type in 81UH which is the 15in 9750H model and it'll show you a list of all benchmarks people have run. 3DMark Time Spy demo is a little bit better. All other programs correctly read my gpu as the 2080s, and my in game fps is what i expect out of a 2080s Ive restarting my pc, reinstalled my gpu, but userbenchmark always detects that i have a 2060. Anyone have an idea why the sequential speeds are so low? I tried raising the core and memory as you said, from 0 to 125, and to 150 but userbenchmark's score still the same, I don't see any difference in gameplay also. Finally, with a gaming score of 47. Today i downloaded the userbenchmark and this is my score MSI B450-A PRO MAX (MS-7B86) Performance Results - UserBenchmark. A Comet Lake Intel Core i5-10600 sample () scored particularly highly in the single-core test. I'm a benchmark noob but shouldn't it be in atleas in the middle of the normal dristribution ? Maby its becouse i have a 1440p monitor and most people are on 1080p. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. gigabyte gaming 3 ab350 corsair lpx vengeance 2*8gb 3200 @ 3066 mhz w/ xmp evga 1080 ti sc2 @ 2025 core clock evga g3 650w When running userbenchmark test, noticed that 3d dx9 scores were very low (101%) compared to dx10 (174%). I'm asking whether their 1-core, 2-core, 4-core, 8-core, and 64-core metrics are reasonably representative metrics. Cinebench: Multi Core - 11978, Single Core - 1157. Without seeing your actual score breakdown, it will be hard to troubleshoot. Ran UserBenchmark out of curiosity, thinking I'd have a slightly better score, but everything pretty much went down a few percent, saying it was performing well below expected. I got a userbenchmark score and It was in the 90th percentile and got 167% in gaming. Everything looks right except my graphics card. 3. This is strange to me. Read the bot reply to my comment. What is your parts list? Consider formatting your parts list. Here are the scores from december 2017 a 'benchmark' site called UserBenchmark recently changed their algorithm so that modem cpus with many cores sometimes score lower than simple 4 core cpus like the 9350kf. RAM score is good. Thanks in advance! 7M subscribers in the buildapc community. for gpu i use unigine superposition CPU: With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Must test CPU performance at low resolution with RTX 5090 You don't necessarily need a PC to be a member of the PCMR. Make sure in Nvidia control panel, all settings are set on performance based and not any "power saving" settings. I would so make sure that your running on a pcie 4. factory scores of 17000-18000 that I have seen on other threads. Setup: MSI MPG X570 Gaming Plus R9 5900x Silicon Power 3200MHz CL16 Xpower Turbine Gaming RAM (Samsung B Die) Sapphire Pulse RX 5700 XT Settings: -. It's only after 8 cores that we stop seeing a point in adding more cores. For maximum efficiency, please double check that you used the appropriate flair. This usually means windows is dying a bad job of power management. This score was achieved in April 2023. It's because you're on a laptop variant of that GPU the laptop variant of that GPU actually limits bus speed to keep temperature down so you will never ever get full use of that GPU it just isn't going to happen they do this so that you don't eat through your battery as well as cause your GPU to fail and get too hot which can cause case meltage and other issues In this subreddit: we roll our eyes and snicker at minimum system requirements. It won't, however, just magically increase the performance, rather it's about balancing out the load. The bias is obvious and embarrassing. As you can see from that benchmark, my RTX3070ti got a reasonable score but I have no idea why graphics card got a very low score and couldn't run Lumion 11 smoothly. I just upgraded from a 1050 Ti to a Zotac GTX 1060 6GB AMP! edition. https://ibb. 2080 ti got 52%. e. RTX 3070 Low Benchmark Scores I recently installed an RTX 3070 FE OC and noticed I'm getting fewer frames in Warzone than expected (Averaging about 100fps). The random 4k and deep queue 4k speeds look pretty normal. I ran the test several times with nothing else running and have gotten as low as the 1st percentile and in this example got ~35% instead of this SSD's average of 50%. I ran userbenchmark and it is saying my GPU is performing below expected. (Rest of specs are rx 580 + 9600k) I have this old hard drive from an old computer. However, even though its overall score is lower than the average total score of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600, the Intel chip was awarded a higher benchmark percentage. GPU: Nvidia GTX 980 Ti. Any chip with a lower memory latency is graded much better in effective speed. Userbenchmark is not the most helpful test anyway, its results often don’t agree with performance in real applications and games. It could be a few other things then, like outdated windows components (run windows update), fragmented HDD (this usually doesn't effect ingame performance unless heavily fragmented) (try Auslogics Disk Defrag, it does get detected as a PUP, potentially unwanted program because it bundles things with the installer, uncheck the options and read It's why you see zen 2 does extremely well in cinebench, even beating 9900k both single and multi score, yet loses in other tasks like gaming ( although it might be negligible in certain cases). Make your card isn't thermal throttling either. TL;DR New Razer Blade 15 lags/stutters during simple tasks like web browsing seemingly due to malfunctioning integrated GPU as userbenchmark scores are low. Reply reply My UserBenchmark scores look reasonable, with the exception of the GPU score, which is in the bottom 20%. So I've been running some benchmarks on my founder's edition 1070 through UserBenchmark, and it's been giving me a really low score. The benchmark I just ran now scored in the 16th percentile with sequential read and write speeds of only 1296 and 1022. Discover discussions, news, reviews, and advice on finding the perfect gaming laptop. Please know that they have been at the center of drama due to accusations of being biased towards certain brands, using outdated or nonsensical means to score products, as well as several other things that you should know. Posted by u/VanillaSnake21 - 2 votes and 13 comments Low UserBenchmark Result Fix Looking to help diagnose issues and get ways to optimize 5 year old laptop. LOW UserBenchmark score for Ryzen 7 5800x Tech Support Solved My cpu seems to be underperforming and affecting my FPS in some games, it isn't the temperature because I always get a relatively cool temp and I have the latest chipset driver here is the benchmark scores, any advice would help. Userbenchmark see's it as a 2060, and scores me quite low. I Welcome to r/gaminglaptops, the hub for gaming laptop enthusiasts. The Temp didn't get higher than 75deg which I'm fine with. and because I've never ran it before . But I pushed the overclock and got a worse score in 3d mark, so I decreased it. Is it rather okay, or should I refund? Archived post. Posted by u/ScaryTheValiant - 2 votes and 3 comments Are Userbenchmark's individual scores useful? I'm not asking about their high-level "Effective Speed" metric. Try running 3dmark and post the results and compare the 3dmark score with other 970s. I know that userbenchmark isn't anywhere near a perfect way to see stuff, but I want to know why my 2060 and hdd is way below average. 5120x1440 = 2 * 2560x1440 side by side. There is nothing else running in the background. I have gotten scores that were much lower (11000 - 12000), seemingly inconsistently even when the GPU is commanded to idle higher (via Nvidia power management settings). They are biased scumbags who will use every trick in the book to make Intel look great and AMD look terrible. So i have a very bad cpu mobo combined with gtx 1080 and i get really low gpu score I wanna know if userbenchmark tests each component individually or does gpu performance depend on other components like cpu and mobo Reason i wanna know this is because I will buy new cpu mobo soon and i wanna know it's not the gpus fault. The score came in at 54. I don't really know why the site said it could be something to do with background CPU utilization but I don't really think that's the problem. 1375 to -. userbenchmark has a rather dubious history as far as rating systems go. Temperature still the same too. Process Lasso is an amazing software I totally recommend using. On stock speeds it's running at 8th percentile. Simplified hardware comparison sites including UserBenchmark, PC Builds, Versus, etc. com/UserRun/51580116. That may be so but they deflate AMD's scores, you can check LTT as they talk about it in multiple videos and other news outlet just by typing userbenchmark news on Google and going to the news tab just on the first page I saw two news sites talking about how they hate AMD products and trash talk them even tho they shouldnt be bias they should Posted by u/badreligion9265 - 1 vote and 8 comments The GPU is consistently rating like bottom 10% of all 3080s on userbenchmark, but another post told me that userbenchmark scores should never be trusted. What are effective frames per second (EFps)? A measure of PC gaming performance that includes frame drops. Our benchmarks show that the 5800X is comparable to Intel’s $175 USD 11400F. How to choose PC components effectively? UserBenchmark's build tool can help to choose PC My new 3070 Ti has been performing well on UserBenchmark as well as FurMark in terms of benchmarks; however, when I go into any game (I have tried League of Legends, Valorant, Kingdom Come Deliverance), my performance is marginally better than my old 770 with FPS gains of maybe 10-20 FPS in League and about the same FPS in Valorant. Their written reviews, not just the scores, are laughable. 0 lane, and that drivers are properly installed. That score is 5960 in overall score, without any overclocking, using a i7-8700. Apr 4, 2020 · I originally built this system for gaming. 0 NVIDIA 461. Best Gaming Monitor - 1080p 240hz vs 1440p 144hz? Posted by u/JohnnyFriday - No votes and 9 comments You seem to be linking to or recommending the use of UserBenchMark for benchmarking or comparing hardware. Learn to overclock, ask experienced users your questions, boast your… Agreed; I Just ran 2 tests on my rig, and one score was just over 10,000 at 1440p, and the next (after I spent 5-minutes closing Steam and other background stuff (headphone software etc) [had to use ALT F4 to shut down Steam properly as it had around 50 background process running]); anyway, with shuting stuff down, the score went nicely over Compared to others high scores, it is nothing to brag about. Is gaming at 1440p, 4K or 8K vs 1080p worth it? Higher resolutions are rarely optimal for gaming: refresh rate > size > resolution more. At stock I get around 20. userbenchmark. com/evBKVmV This is why comparing different GPUs/CPUs using userbenchmark introduces the website's editorial biases. more. Check out the r/AMD thread for conspiratorial rants about how Intel is secretly paying userbenchmark's owner for daring to show gaming benchmarks. Welcome to the official subreddit of the PC Master Race / PCMR! All PC-related content is welcome, including build help, tech support, and any doubt one might have about PC ownership. As per the bot, userbenchmark data is questionable at best. Userbenchmark tells me that it is "Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)", my Geekbench scores were a few hundred points lower than average, and my 3dMark scores were also low. Hi, yesterday I built my pc. 3%. But when the hardware is the same, the weightings will be the same, so you can compare the scores to see if your hardware is performing well compared to other people with the same hardware. Please know that they have been at the center of drama due to accusations of being biased towards certain brands, using outdated or nonsensical means to score produts, as well as several other things that you should know. 278) at the 90% confidence interval or above. UserBenchmarks: Game 113%, Desk 83%, Work 86% Hello, I built my pc this summer and I'm receiving very low benchmarks scores for my i7-8700k 3. Welcome to the official subreddit of the PC Master Race / PCMR! All PC-related content is welcome… So I’m selling my old pc that has a 970 in it. My graphic card is rtx 2060. It looks like you have some performance issues and you did not include a userbenchmark test. Now I will share the results of my preliminary tests. All passmark is, is raw numbers, unlike userbenchmark. Crypto Can you give a link to the result, thx. UserBenchmark is the subject of concerns over the accuracy and integrity of their benchmark and review process. Your post is currently waiting for mod approval. You just have to love PCs. In this subreddit: we roll our eyes and snicker at minimum system requirements. in most cases it was stuttery frame rate. com They're horribly biased against AMD and deliberately manipulate their scoring and testing to make AMD score worse, which also has a side effect of making their other non-AMD benchmarks also worthless due to wacky scoring. I did some more tests today and progressively got lower until it hit 159% in gaming. are unreliable sources as a result of questionable methodology, comparison of on-paper specs that do not directly correlate to performance, and bias in some cases. Its still a shit score, for my hardware, but its still a great score for a pc, so It doesn't explain why i get 80 fps in call of duty warzone, and 150 fps in league of legends. Motherboard: ROG Strix X570-E Gaming Memory: G. Hi, thanks for posting on r/pcgamingtechsupport. I've been getting random stutters whilst playing CSGO, game freezing and the PC just running slow and buggy in general. Substantially lower score in geekbench than that shown on site I recently bought a lenovo tower (IdeaCenter G5 14IMB05) with i5-10400 and ran geekbench cpu benchmark to discover that it's multi-core speed is between 4900-5000 as opposed to 5662 according to geekbench. not every GPU is gonna score above 50th percentile. Motherboard : Z490 Phantom Gaming 4 GPU: Gigabyte RTX 3070 Monitors: AORUS CV27Q - 2560x1440p bench mark score : SCORE 4964 FPS 83 3D RendererGeForce RTX 3070/PCIe/SSE2 3D APIOpenGL 4. What… For absolute performance of a 3080 in a given game you can get an approximate result by just looking at wqhd benchmarks and halving their fps/doubling their frametime. No background applications or high usage. I would assume the score is low because the turbo boost number is 1. The 178% score could not be determined as an outlier (G value of 2. Cheers. 7GHz cpu. Basically the title. Now when I run Userbenchmark both my CPU and GPU have low scores (CPU= 33th percentile, GPU= 17th percentile) Could this be caused by a shortage of power getting to my components? I've tried to DDU my GPU and ran a stress test for a while. userbenchmark tells me that my 1080ti is at the bottom 8% of all 1080ti tested, which i dont understand. Just recently (2weeks ago) bought a 2070S and checked it with UB today. 90GHz OSWindows 10 64-bit build 19042 Why is my UserBenchmark score so low? I use an AMD Ryzen 3 2200G, 16GB of DDR4 ram and a Radeon RX570 for my build and that usually gets me around 45% on UserBenchmark but I just tried it out multiple times and it gave me a 20%. I've also tied the top 5800X score on the site (113%) mainly due to memory latency and single thread performance, yet my build does not show up in the top 5800X results, because it's a high volume part with The best TimeSpy GPU score I could get was 14600 vs. Any thoughts would be appreciated! Share Add a Comment I know userbenchmark is hated and bad but I ran a score for fun in a lesson with my laptop just propped up, +250mhz core, +950mhz VRAM and got a stupidly high score, accidentally beat the best recorded score by a LOT, ssd test failed on sequential read/write so score wont upload sadly When I got my laptop I had to change every test from userbenchmark in the settings, it was like 6-8 iirc, from automatic to "use the Nvidia card" and then it worked, but it never showed the 1660ti (2060 in your case) with low %, that's really odd, do you get good fps on games? No it’s totally possible, userbenchmark runs on scaling system basically, 100% is 1070, 200% is 2080ti, and all the cards below and in between. Go into subdued power settings and set it you power plan to ryzen balanced or performance and try again (these settings tell endures not to screw up your power settings and let the cpu handheld it instead). Please run a test from the website userbenchmark. Run other GPU tests, 3dmark TimeSpy and FireStrike are good benchmarks. Memory: 2 TB HD and 250GB Samsung SSD. This is not surprising because 178% is only ~2. Compare the scores you get there (GPU score) with scores from other 7900xtx cards. Reply Planning on building a computer but need some advice? This is the place to ask! /r/buildapc is a community-driven subreddit dedicated to custom PC assembly. The thing is, the max temps never go past 44 Celsius on any of the cores, even when at 100% load with Prime95. Skill F4-3200C16-8GTZR DDR4 8X4 Do me a favor and run userbenchmark and share the link. People only care because AMD has lower gaming performance, and therefore ooga booga tribalism dictates we riot to protect m'lady Su's honor. 7 and it says that’s above average. It's showing that the CPU is performing below expectations. UserBenchmark does this well, but is frequently cited as unreliable. This is a community for anyone struggling to find something to play for that older system, or sharing or seeking tips for how to run that shiny new game on yesterday's hardware. Ya I do have xmp for ram in the bios. co/rx2GnHC. Motherboard: Asus Z97-A. In my excitement I went over to User Benchmark to run a test and it showed that my brand spanking new GPU was performing way below average (around 20th 25th percentile). 45 (other LP-5 benchmarks show higher than this). 3DMARK Time Spy: 11638. I know many people overclock the clockspeed, and that 1080TI OC also counts to 1080ti, but it shoulndt perform that bad. Link: https://imgur. Userbenchmark places a lot of weight on storage speed, and it looks like all your storage devices are getting low/slow scores. Quite sad that nothing else comes close to these processors for gaming, nor in low power consumption. 1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. Here's my userbenchmark info. Don't ever, ever use userbenchmark, please. 3dmark/unigine superposition are absolutely more reputable though. I just got my new X16 R1 laptop with 13900HK and 4080 gpu & I ran a userbenchmark test on it and it scored 29% for gaming and said it will struggle to render games higher than 1080 resolution? View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. So that led to me to this. I think it has nothing to do with it, but today I upgraded the GPU driver and decided to run it again. It's reporting very low. I recently finished my build and when running userbenchmark my Samsung 970 Evo is scoring really low. Hello, I recently built my first PC with the following specs: [UserBenchmarks: Game 114%, Desk 121%, Work 104%](… Very poor Userbenchmark score with top of the line components, what am I doing wrong? Thermals are great, demanding games like Metro exodus, RDR2, cyberpunk, kingdom come deliverance run at ultra 3440x1440 80-100 fps, no complains. 09 Resolution 2560x1440 Duration 60000 ms CPUIntel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700 CPU @ 2. and later upgraded the gpu because i wanted to play at 4k max settings. Still a 10% lower than expected, so I just enabled PBO and set the PT limit to 95W, which yields max temps around 72 at very low noise volume. It can be a useful tool to try and figure out if something is really wrong with the system, but again, without seeing the score, it will be hard to tell if anything/what is going on. ldicrh lca xziiw dhs ertsgumg lqpsbyk lipal vqwquo bitgs mqtv